Evolution: Science vs. Religion :: essays research papers fc

"What is the just ab come out of the closet profound question thathuman beings can ask about themselves?It has to be Where do we come from?That leads, of course, to Where does only carriage come from?" These questions film provoke humanity for years. Manydifferent views on the origin of humankindhave been debated and remain in questiontoday. ( Edey, pg.1 )One view is known as "creation-science".It is commonly understood to refer to amovement of Christian fundamentalists found upon an extremely literalinterpretation of the Bible.Creation-scientists do not merely asseveratethat life was suddenly created they insistthat the job was completed in sextuplet days no more than ex thousand years ago, andthat all evolution since that time hasinvolved trivial modifications rather then fundamental changes. The existence of fossils,according to a Creation-scientist, isattributed to Noahs flood. ( Johnson,pg.4 )"Creationism", another view on mansorigin, way of life judgement in creation in a more normal sense. A Creationist may believethat the earth is billions of years old, andthat simple forms of life evolved graduallyto form more complex forms includinghumans. In addition to that belief,however, is the belief that a supernatural actor initiated the life process andcontinues to control it. ( Johnson, pg.4 )The intimately reasonable view on the origin ofmankind is known as naturalistic evolution.It means a gradual process by which nonpareilkind of living creature changes intosomething different evolution that is not tell by any purposeful intelligence.Another part of the idea is that morecomplex forms have arisen from simplerforms. Tracing back to the simplest livingthing, a bacterium, scientists may find theorigin of mankind by finding somethingeven simpler, something out of which bacterium themselves came. Recent work hasrevealed the existence of a group ofbacteria that are as different from otherbacteria as the last mentioned are from plants andanimals. This discovery compels thereorganization of all life forms into afamily corner unlike the traditional ones. Outof this reorganization comes a strong suggestion that there is a single ancestorto all modern forms of life. ( Edey, pg.297)The teemingness of evidence that there waslife much earlier then ten thousand yearsago makes it easy to disprove the view ofthe Creation-scientists. It is life-threatening todisprove the Creationists view because itis similar to the view of naturalisticevolution. The only contravention is simplythat a Creationist believes in a divineCreator as opposed to life beginningnaturally. An argument againstCreationism can be found, however, in theimperfections of nature. "Perfection couldbe imposed by a wise Creator or bynatural selection. Perfection covers thetracks of past news report. And past history --the evidence of descent -- is the mark of