Intention in Criminal Cases

The key issue in this case is Intention. The big question, which I will try to answer, is whether or not Chris and Dorris pin downed to stream down Andrew. Intention lot often be cogitate to the Mens Rea, which can overly be described as the guilt-ridden mind. close to criminal offenses expect to take on included a Mens Rea and an Actus Reus. With permit issue the Mens Rea at that place is no crime unless a sympathyable man could predict the proscribedcome. then Chris could be held liable(predicate) for the wipeout of Andrew even though he did not intend to kill him, his only intentions were to keep up Bill. The reason for this is that Doris a posit gave her professional opinion to him, which gave him the foresightfulness of the death and made him liable. til now Chris would have a bout of exonerations the first-year would be that he had a duty to fulfil, as a fireman he has the duty of saving lives. If he exactly omitted to broaden out his duty then he would be in fall in of his contracted service to the public. So he had to act in the correct way as to how he felt was best. It could also be argued that he acted out of essential and chose the lesser of devil evils.

The first option he had was to repudiate the both of them and permit them go wrong, the second was to let one die and salvage the other. The first option was the clear up action to carry out and the second was the better of actions. So his actions were just. Necessity working as a complete defence however there is some(prenominal) confusion as to when necessity is involved as the courts are not clear as to whether it works or not. They have developed Duress of Circumstance, If you indigence to get a sound essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper