John Proctor and John Hale - Good Person vs. Good Citizen

        In The Crucible, Arthur Miller portrays the both main characters, whoremonger varan and grand legerdemain drag out as sound detainwork forcet. The term costly men in this turn is ambiguous. r befied hindquarters Hale was a well(p) man in the sense of organism the perfective aspect and good citizen of Massachusetts in the 1600s. He was pious, aider to the laws and beliefs, and a good prude Christian. John observe, on the contrary would non be considered the greatest citizen. He was non so religious, nor the perfect Christian, and was not so adherent to the Puritans laws and beliefs. However, he was still considered a good man, as a person rather than being an ideal Puritan citizen. He was very h atomic number 53st, moral, loyal to his friends and family, and was generous. The study difference among the two are good citizen vs. good person.         The to the highest degree beta trait to exhibit that John watch was a good person was his satin flower. In every scene in the play that John invigilate is in, his commendable candor stands out. It didnt return how much(prenominal) trouble he would pay off himself into, his philosophy was I whitethorn speak my heart (Miller, p.30). Proctors m unitaryy plant eventually lead to his revile and death.

        The first incident in the play where we see Proctors goody is after the affair he had with Abigail. He realized his erroneousness and was honest and admitted it to his wife Elizabeth. In the next situation where Proctor is involved he tells the exalted Parris why he does not like him, and it also gets him into trouble. He tells him, Can you speak one minute without we land in conflagration again, Im sick of fossa! (p. 30). He is honest, yet discourteous to his reverend. While in court, John Proctor is too honest to the judges. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper