Proving Romeo and Juliet is not a tragedy.

If somebody were to see someone fall off of a cliff they would believe that it was a tragedy. While on the differently hand some people may believe that it was fate. They be both correct answers. Fate feeds a major causa in a tragedy and/or comedy and sometimes it can even control the outcome. Yet fate creates oft fun and excitement towards literature and it keeps the reader more attentive. Shakespeargon has draw up many plays including comedies and tragedies. His tragedies seem to be among his more famous plays and they commonly end in sorrow. However, most of Shakespeares plays are different; they bind an essence of what tragedies really are. Still, many individuals argue if all of Shakespeares tragedies cross away the true characteristics and essence of a tragedy, or if they are rattling controlled by fate. A more commonly argued play is Romeo and Juliet. In this play, Romeo and Juliet are victims of fate and they can non be designate tragic heroes. Sha kespeare demonstrates this through the protagonists need of tragic flaws, the absence of them having the highest stance in caller and due to the lack of hubristic character envisioned by them. Shakespeares characters lack much hubristic character. To have hubris one mustiness have an abundance of arrogance and/or pride.

This in revoke blinds the hero from realizing the troubles they create. For instance Romeo has very little hubristic character. Romeo is not irresponsible and he is certified of his surroundings. Romeo is not at all swollen-headed because he does not believe that he is more sacred of Juliet than anyone else and he lacks pride.! In Act 3, Scene 1, Romeo slays Tybalt because Tybalt had slain Mercutio who was a dear takeoff booster to Romeo. When the Prince arrives at the scene Benvolio utters, at that place lies... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper