Reproductive Health Bill Essay

II. BODYThe first time the Reproductive Health placard was proposed was in 1998. During the boon 15th Congress, the RH Bills filed argon those authored by House minority Leader Edcel Lagman of Albay, HB 96 Iloilo Rep. Janette Garin, HB 101, Akbayan Representatives Kaka Bag-ao & Walden Bello HB 513, Muntinlupa Representative Rodolfo Biazon, HB 1160, Iloilo Representative Augusto Syjuco, HB 1520, Gabriela Rep. Luzviminda Ilagan. In the Senate, Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago has filed her own version of the RH bill which, she says, will be part of the countrys lading to international covenants. On January 31, 2011, the House of Representatives Committee on Population and Family dealings voted to consolidate all House versions of the bill, which is entitled An bring Providing for a cosmopolitan Policy on Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health and Population festering and for Other Purposes.One of the main concerns of the bill, according to the Explanatory Note, is that popula tion of the Philippines shed light ons it the twelfth most populous nation in the world today, that the Philippine womens fertility rate is at the upper bracket of 206 countries. It states that studies and surveys fork up that the Filipinos are responsive to having smaller-sized families by means of free choice of family think methods. It similarly refers to studies which show that rapid population growth exacerbates distress while p overty spawns rapid population growth. And so it aims for improved quality of aliveness through a consis tent and coherent national population form _or_ system of government.Reproductive health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well- being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the productive system and to its functions and processes. Reproductive health therefore implies that people are fitting to sustain a satisfying and safe sex life and that they have the capability to reproduce a nd the freedom to decide if, when and how often to do so. connotative in this last condition are the counterbalance of men and women to be informed and to have access to safe, effective, affordable and acceptable methods of family cookery of their choice, as well as other methods of their choice for regulation of fertility which are not against the law, and the right of access to appropriate health-care services that will modify women to go safely through pregnancy and childbirth and provide couples with the dispatch up chance of having a healthy infant. In line with the above commentary of procreative health, reproductive health care is defined as the conformation of methods, techniques and services that contribute to reproductive health and well-being through preventing and lick reproductive health problems.It likewise includes sexual health, the purpose of which is the enhancement of life and personal relations, and not merely counselling and care related to counterpar t and sexually transmitted diseases. 7.3. Bearing in mind the above definition, reproductive rights embrace certain human rights that are already recognized in national laws, international human rights documents and other relevant United Nations consensus documents. These rights backup on the recognition of the basic right of all couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing and timing of their children and to have the schooling and means to do so, and the right to attain the highest standard of sexual.There are 6 bills pertaining to reproductive health and/or population management that have been filed for deliberation in both the House of Representatives and the Senate for the 15th Congress.The most controversial of these bills is House Bill No. 96 authored by Rep. Edcel Lagman. House Bill No. 96, also known as the proposed Reproductive Health and Population and Development Act of 2010, will cover the following areasmidwives of skilled attendanceeme rgency obstetric careaccess to family planningmaternal death re facefamily planning supplies as substantial medicinesbenefits for serious and life-threatening reproductive health conditions runny health care servicemandatory age-appropriate reproductive health and sexual practice educationresponsibility of local family planning office and certificate of complaisancecapability building of barangay health workersideal family sizeemployers responsibilitiesmulti-media campaignimplementing mechanisms coverage requirementsprohibited actspenaltiesThe bill is controversial, as it is being opposed by concern citizens, especially the pro-life, pro-family and pro-God groups, regardless of creed or religion. The Roman Catholic perform expresses its opposition against the bill on many counts, most especially the procurance and distribution of family planning supplies for the whole country, when the available evidence from peer reviewed health check journals supports the hypothesis that w hen ovulation and fertilization occur in women taking oral contraceptives (OCs) or using intrauterine devices (IUD), post-fertilization effects are operative on creator to prevent clinically recognized pregnancy. Hormonal contraceptives and/or IUDs directly strickle the endometrium. These effects have been presumed to render the endometrium relatively inhospitable to implantation or to the maintenance of the preembryo or embryo prior to clinically recognized pregnancy. These lease pills and IUDS abortifacient.Pro-life groups, and many professionals in the medical and nursing fields, believe that physicians and policy makers should understand and respect the beliefs of patients who consider human life to be present and valuable from the moment of fertilization. Patients should be made fully aware of this information so that they can consent to or refuse the use of imitative contraceptives.However, the position of the Catholic Church and the pro-life groups does not mean that they drag the attitude of natalism at all costs, as if the number of children, in itself, were the intelligible sign of authentic christian matrimonial life.The sexual act, properly exercised in spite of appearance marriage only, is ordained primarily to the propagation of life. If there are bonny motives for spacing births, overmuch(prenominal) as serious medical conditions in the get under ones skin, or extreme poverty, then the Catholic Church teaches that married couples may retort advantage of the natural cycles of the reproductive system and use their marriage just those times that are infertile (natural family planning).Other aspects of the bill being repugn by concerned citizens include the classification of family planning supplies as essential medicines when their safety/toxicity profile and legal permissibility are questionable. At the selfsame(prenominal) time, more importance should be given to the prevalent diseases, the top ten leading causes of morbidity and mo rtality in the Philippines, namely, infections such as pneumonia and tuberculosis. pecuniary resources allotted by foreign donors to assist the Philippine government programs could real be better spent towards pursuing health programs targeting communicable diseases than buying artificial contraceptives.Very pertinent to the debate about reproduction rights is the right to life. The Philippine Constitution says that the State shall equally protect the life of the mother and the life of the unborn from conception. If artificial contraceptives are medically proven to contract abortion as one of their mechanisms of action, then procurement and distribution of such family planning supplies are unconstitutional and illegal.Benefits of the RH BillAllow couples to make decision to plan for their familiesThe RH Bills gives the couples and the women, specifically, the choice and freedom on the elan of family planning they want to pursue depending on their needs, choice, personal convicti ons and religious beliefs. save the RH Bill is not just about the family planning Prevents get around of sexually transmitted disease like aids and STDs and eventually moderate population growth necessary for economic development The liberal minds view the RH Bill as a strategy in conflict overpopulation and the spreading of AID and STD diseases. Thats what they say. They believe that the natural way of family planning is passe in this time of new-made age. They want children as archaeozoic as in their pre-teens to be taught about sex education.Enhance charwomans health as she will be able to visit when to get pregnant The women can determine when they want to get pregnant. through and through this will, it will ensure the health of the women, which can be put to gamble with pre-existing condition such as diabetes or pregnancies with not much gap or spaced-closed together. They will gain more control over their bodies and health. This will also ensure the children of having a healthy mother to take care of them.Prevents unwanted pregnancyIt can be argued, in fact, that in guaranteeing information on and access to medically-safe, legal, affordable and quality natural and modern family planning methods (sec. 2), the bill seeks to prevent unwanted, unplanned and mistimed pregnancies the main cause of generate abortions