Legal Age to Drink – Should It Be Changed?

Legal Age to Drink Should it be Changed? In this day and aging age with more sophisticated teens and young people abusing inebriant, the thin concerning whether or not puerilers should be able to sop up at a younger age is an important topic. In the hold Perils of Prohibition Elizabeth M. Whelan argues that alcoholic drinkic drink should be intelligentized at the age of eighteen instead of twenty-one. She hopes to persuade readers, pargonnts, and educators to attendant her proposal for the change by prospering alcohol education.Although Whelan yields valuable examples to bring up that proper alcohol education is an effective solution in reduce the problems faced with alcohol abuse among American teenagers, she does not offer sufficient substantial point to justify changing the legal insobriety age to eighteen long time old. In the beginning paragraphs, Whelan compares alcohol exercise with American teens and their European peers. She says, American teens, unlike their European peers, dont attend how to drink gradu whollyy, cautiously, and in moderation (2).This is a great example because it delivers the readers conceptualize closely the different cultural views of alcohol consumption among youthful drinkers globally. though the consumption of alcohol in France, Spain, and Portugal is higher than the coupled States per person, the rate of drink and alcohol abuse is lower (4). Whelan hopes to prove that if moderate alcohol consumption and proper awareness of the use of it is instilled in children eighteen years old and up indeed imbibition alcohol should be okay. She compares threesome countries to the United States in her example.We live in a pretty big world, is it the alike in other drink countries? The example is decently effective simply study drinking habits in only three countries to the United States is not enough to persuade readers. In order to gain support for successful alcohol education universe a key factor in hel ping the problems faced with alcohol abuse, Whelan mentions an example involving her missy. She explained to her daughter the differences in alcohol subject fields and the importance of not drinking on an empty set up (8).The strength of this example is effective because it is coming from personal go through. Its flesh out and provided by a woman whose education and occupation qualifies her to even up this patient of of study. This type of person often makes you want to believe him or her. However, this cull of evidence uses the hasty generalization fallacy. A single personal experience or even many is not enough to convince readers. peoples personal experiences differ greatly. And how do the readers even know if alcohol education was successful with her daughter?Her daughter may not bring in gotten herself into trouble recently exactly shes still under the legal age of drinking and who knows what would happen once she goes off to college? Because of her daughters age and the fallacy used, creates a weak example for supporting alcohol education. Whelan continues with examples to prove that proper education is the key instead of prohibiting teenagers the serious to drink until the age of twenty-one. She mentions tragic accidents that occurred at the Ivy League school her daughter Christine depart be attending in the fall.A learner who was nearly electrocuted when, in a drunken state, climbed on a moving train. The student survived precisely lost three of his limbs (10). A second incident where an intoxicated student ended up in a chimney and was found three days later dead (10). She hopes to convince readers that students do not make good choices when they drink, if theyre not educated properly. The tragedies with the sick, injured students are fair because theyre emotionally appealing to the reader but weak because she fails to provide statistical evidence as to how often injuries of this kind occur.The examples are complete and rare ones that are unlikely to happen on a unceasing basis. Whelan continues supporting her offer by mentioning a study that was done at the Harvard School of Public Health by her colleagues. What they found in their postdate of college students was that they drink early and . . . often, frequently to the point of getting ill (1). She defends her claim by appealing to authority as evidence. And readers would not be content knowing that students are becoming sick from irresponsible drinking the man factor.This study is included to let people know that college students are drinking irresponsibly and becoming sick from it as a result. Not surprisingly, she failed to provide statistical evidence again. That is, evidence of how many students is involved in the come off and the diversity of people in the study. These are important factors needed to be included in the survey to make it believable and convincing to the readers. Finally, both analogies are given by Whelan in hopes of her readers to accept her case. This author creates a weak analogy when comparing sex education to alcohol education.In an try out to change the legal age of drinking to twenty-one, she says we choose to teach our children about safe sex, including the benefits of teen abstinence, why not about safe drinking? (13) The only similarity is that drinking and sex can cause unguaranteed or unwanted events, therefore it makes sense to be educated on both subjects. However, the similarity is not relevant enough to be considered a good analogy. Safe sex education has been taught for many years to children but it has not stopped them from having sex or preventing unwanted pregnancies.If this is the case, how would safe drinking education be convincing to the readers to change the legal age to eighteen? The second analogy which is fairly significant in dealing with the wickedness of the legal age to drink, is comparing the ability for teens to be able to endeavor cars, fly planes, marry, vote, pay taxes , take out loans, and pretends their lives in the U. S fortify forces to drinking. She says, At eighteen theyre considered adults but when they want to enjoy a drink like other adults, they are disenfranchised (5).Whelan hopes this evidence will convince readers that if eighteen year olds are given adult responsibilities then they shall be treated as adults in all aspects of life, including drinking alcohol in moderation. She makes a great point with the comparison but when comparing voting, paying taxes, taking out a loan, and marrying to drinking, the responsibilities dont louse up your brain in a way that drinking alcohol would. Whelan presents herself as a kind-hearted woman who is a bit upset and frustrated with the underway laws regarding the legal age to drink.The example she uses explaining how she educated her daughter with regards to alcohol content shows her taking a subtle approach with allowing her daughter to drink sooner than making it appear to be a bad thing if you are under the legal age. (8) She shows compassion and concern. Whelans tone throughout the set about is fairly tolerable, but she does show some depreciation towards the government when she compares teenagers being able to drive cars, fly planes, marry, vote, pay taxes, take out loans, and risk their lives as members of the U. S. rmed forces but laws in all fifty say that no alcoholic beverages may be sold to anyone until that magic twenty-first birthday. (3) When she mentions we should make access to alcohol legal at eighteen and at the same time, we should come down much harder on alcohol abusers and drunk drivers of all ages (12) she is genuinely concerned of the welfare of all people with regards to alcohol and safety. She thirstily wants to make a difference. And as public-health scientist with a daughter heading to college, she has superior and personal concerns in regards to the dangers of alcohol.While it is obvious that Whelans heart is in the right place and that alcohol abuse among teenagers is a problem, her argument suffers from lack of evidence to support changing the legal age of drinking to eighteen years old. Proper alcohol education can be helpful in terms of improving the problem but thats it. Whelans article indicates a need for further study on the abuse of teenage drinking. It would be helpful to see statistical results in studies done among colleges crossways the nation and in all areas from rich to poor. The more valid studies the rectify chance finding the proper solutions to the problem.